Study finds that cuts to local gov funding has cost lives

University of Liverpool research has found that decreasing local government funding over recent years probably contributed to declines in life expectancy in some areas of England.

The study, published in The Lancet Public Health, linked annual local government funding data from the Ministry of Housing, Communities, and Local Government with life expectancy and mortality data from Public Health England between 2013 and 2017.

On average between 2013 and 2017 central funding to local governments decreased by 33 per cent, or £168 per person in total. Each £100 reduction in funding per person was associated with a decrease in 1.3 months in male life expectancy and 1.2 months in female life expectancy.

The university states that, as funding reductions were greater in more deprived areas, these places were more severely affected, increasing the gap in life expectancy between those places and more affluent areas. Researchers estimated that cuts in funding increased the gap in life expectancy between the most and least deprived areas by three per cent for men and four per cent for women. Overall reductions in funding during this period were associated with an additional 9600 deaths in people younger than 75 years old.

Dr Alexandros Alexiou, the report author, said: “Since 2010, large reductions in funding for local government services have been introduced in England, which led to reduced provision of health-promoting public services. We wanted to investigate whether areas that showed a greater decline in funding also had more adverse trends in life expectancy and premature mortality.

“Prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, stalling life expectancy in England was a major public health concern, and the causes were unclear. Our research shows that cuts to local government over recent years have probably cost lives. We found that, during a period of large reductions in funding for local government in England, areas that experienced the greatest cuts also experienced slower improvements or a decline in life expectancy. As funding for the most deprived areas decreased to a greater extent, they experienced the most adverse impact – widening health inequalities. This has important implications for current policy and for recovery from the Covid-19 pandemic.”